Economics In Reverse – ObamaCare

Obama likes very much skyrocketing gasoline costs, skyrocketing coal costs, and skyrocketing energy costs for Americans (see Obama To Gut Domestic Drilling).

Obama’s next plan is, predictably, skyrocketing health insurance premiums.

Since Obama plans to run doctors OUT of health care by paying them much less, health care itself will be rationed, as in Canada and Cuba and the UK, Obama’s model socialized health care programs.

At the same time, Obama hopes his favorite funding class trial lawyers will extract MORE CASH from health care; so they can donate it to his moronic political campaigns (see Trial Lawyers Feast: ObamaCare).

Illegal aliens will have priority health care, so ACORN can register happy and healthy illegal aliens to vote for Obama (on your dime).

This is the same Economics In Reverse that destroyed 100 MILLION human lives in Asia and Europe in the last century; if Obama can destroy 100 MILLION human lives in the United States, then he will have saved the Earth, he thinks. Destruction of human life is very much his goal; although canines have come under attack also lately. Destruction of capitalist trappings like auto manufacturing companies and banks is also high on Obama’s list of accomplishments; but there is much more destruction to be done.

Economics In Reverse – Obama is a BACKWARD student of REVERSE history and REVERSE economics; he has both in reverse.

Skyrocketing health insurance premiums and outrageously expensive health care legislation is how Obama cuts your costs. Economics is running in reverse in Washington DC, and in the United States, thanks to the Backwards President Obama.

Premiums to Skyrocket Under Obamacare

Here

Skyrocketing insurance premiums will slam millions of consumers next year because of “indirect taxes” contained in both the House and Senate versions of healthcare reform, according to various medical and insurance industry experts.

Healthcare reforms that were supposed to contain costs actually will cause a sharp hike in premiums, they add. In fact, several studies indicate consumers’ premiums could more than double next year if healthcare reform takes effect.

“So even though this bill tries to hide these costs as indirect taxes,” Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, recently told a business symposium, “average Americans who purchase health plans, take prescription drugs, or use medical devices will end up footing the bill.”

The rate hikes stem from the hundreds of billions in proposed fees and taxes levied on providers.

For example, the Finance Committee’s proposal would assess $322 billion in taxes and fees on insurance premiums, prescription drugs, and medical devices, according to the Senate’s Joint Committee on Taxation.

The committee and other experts say virtually all of those costs will be passed along to consumers in all tax brackets — despite President Barack Obama’s pledge not to raise taxes “one dime” on those earning less than $250,000 per year.

Another likely frustration for consumers: The premium hikes will take effect right away, while the subsidies and benefits in healthcare reform won’t kick in completely until 2014.

Scott Gottlieb, a physician and American Enterprise Institute resident fellow, stated Thursday in a New York Post op-ed that, by front-loading the costs and back-loading benefits, Congress is resorting to “a gimmick that imposes a stiff price on the public.”

That “gimmick,” Gottlieb claims: using 10 years of added fees and taxes on providers to offset about five years worth of benefits. Those costs “will immediately shift onto consumers, in the form of higher prices on medical products and rising premiums,” he says.

Democrats have promised to insure an additional 35 million Americans, without raising taxes or increasing the tsunami of deficit red ink spilling out of Washington these days.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, the former director of the Congressional Budget Office, appeared to concur with Gottlieb’s assessment in a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed.

“These costs will be passed on to consumers by either directly raising insurance premiums, or by fueling higher health-care costs that inevitably lead to higher premiums,” he wrote.

The bottom line: Most voters will be paying higher premiums for years before they see any benefits. That could spell serious trouble for Democrats in the 2010 midterm elections.

The Senate bill proposes $2.3 billion in fees on brand-name drugs, $4 billion on medical devices, and $6.7 billion levied on insurance companies, plus more than $100 billion in Medicare reimbursements to medical providers — all costs that would be shifted back onto consumers.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s House bill appears even more expensive. It would impose $150 billion in Medicare cuts on the pharmaceutical industry, and a 2.5 percent tax on companies that manufacture medical devices.

“Most of astounding of all,” Holtz-Eakin wrote, “is what this Congress is willing to do to struggling middle-class families. The bill would impose nearly $400 billion in new taxes and fees. Nearly 90 percent of that burden will be shouldered by those making $200,000 or less.”

Just how much will insurance premiums jump once the Democratic reforms kick in? The figures vary from state to state.

According to a recent study by Wellpoint, the massive Blue Cross/Blue Shield licensee that provides insurance coverage to one in nine Americans, some older and less healthy consumers could actually see rate reductions. But those cuts would be more than offset by the spiraling premium increases hitting other insurance customers.

Based on provisions in the bill passed by the Senate Finance Committee, which is more conservative than the broad proposals put forth by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Speaker Pelosi, Wellpoint projects that healthy people in their mid-20s could see their annual premiums increase by more than 150 percent in at least seven states: Indiana (199 percent); Kentucky (199 percent); Maine (172 percent); Missouri (199 percent); Ohio (199 percent); Virginia (175 percent); and Wisconsin (199 percent).

For individuals of average age and health, and the small businesses employing them, the estimated rate hikes in the 14 states where Wellpoint does business would be:

California

Individual – 53 percent

Small Employer – 22 percent

Colorado

Individual – 52 percent

Small Employer – 9 percent

Connecticut

Individual – 64 percent

Small Employer – 8 percent

Georgia

Individual – 85 percent

Small Employer – 16 percent

Indiana

Individual – 122 percent

Small Employer – 20 percent

Kentucky

Individual – 122 percent

Small Employer – 22 percent

Maine

Individual – 172 percent

Small Employer – 18 percent

Missouri

Individual – 122 percent

Small Employer – 18 percent

Nevada

Individual – 61 percent

Small Employer – 16 percent

New Hampshire

Individual – 19 percent

Small Employer – 15 percent

New York

Individual – 82 percent

Small Employer – 6 percent

Ohio

Individual – 122 percent

Small Employer – 16 percent

Virginia

Individual – 96 percent

Small Employer – 25 percent

Wisconsin

Individual – 122 percent

Small Employer -17 percent

It’s important to note, however, that Wellpoint’s projected rate increases do not account for the increase in medical-service costs over time. Nor do they account for other, less obvious costs likely to accompany reform. So the actual premium increases might be higher.

Assuming voters aren’t happy with skyrocketing premiums, the political pressure to limit the cost-shifting could be tremendous. Dr. Russell L. Blaylock, a board-certified neurosurgeon and staunch opponent of the reform proposals, who authors the Blaylock Wellness Report for Newsmax Media, predicts that politicians would attempt to block the cost-shifting to consumers.

Doing so, he warns, would seriously impact the quality of U.S. healthcare.

“Of course, the government will anticipate this and prevent the doctors and hospitals from passing these costs to their patients,” Blaylock tells Newsmax. “And this leaves one option: Severe rationing of care, which the government has wanted all along.”

The spiraling costs contained in the Affordable Health Care for America Act that Pelosi unveiled Thursday drew heavy fire:

Competitive Enterprise Institute senior fellow Gregory Conko called the bill “a recipe for exploding costs,” adding: “The Affordable Health Care for America Act is anything but affordable. It will force millions of Americans to pay higher health insurance premiums, it taxes individuals who would like to purchase insurance options that don’t meet standards set by Washington bureaucrats, and it forces businesses and individuals to pay for insurance benefits they don’t want and don’t need.”

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Retail Federation, the National Association of Manufacturers, and seven other major associations sent a letter to Pelosi warning the legislation “falls short of the bipartisan goal of controlling costs.”

Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., the chairman of the House Republican Conference, told CNN the Pelosi plan “looks like another freight train of big government with more taxes, more mandate and more spending – and that’s not what the American people want in healthcare reform.” He added that a search showed the nearly 2,000-page bill contains the directive “shall” 3,425 times.

Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., remarked: “The people of this country want reforms that provide them with more choices, more competition, more innovation, higher quality, and lower costs. Instead, Democrat leaders have worked in secret to write a bill that does exactly the opposite.”

Karen Ignagni, the president of the America’s Health Insurance Plans trade group that lobbies Congress on behalf of insurance companies, called the proposal “a missed opportunity.” Ignagni predicted “families and employers will not be able to afford coverage and healthcare costs will rise at a rate much faster than the overall economy is able to sustain.” In addition to the Wellpoint study, AHIP says three other reports, including one by PricewaterhouseCoopers, project that the legislative proposals will cause premiums to increase “far faster and higher” than they would under the present system.

Voters probably won’t like getting socked with higher premiums if the reforms pass. But most of them won’t be that surprised.

A recent Rasmussen Reports poll showed 57 percent of voters nationwide expect the reforms that were supposed to reduce costs actually will make them go up. Also, 53 percent of voters expect the quality of healthcare in the post-reform era will get worse.

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Advertisements

One Response

  1. Whose on America’s side?
    All these so-called public servants took an oath of office, to protect Americans from Domestic and foreign enemies. But with Senators such as Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, Sen.Durbin, House speaker Nancy Pelosi and Janet Napolitano running Homeland Security, we already have the domestic enemies. They spend more time undermining immigration enforcement, than protecting citizens and legal residents from the 20 to 30 million illegal aliens. I joined NUMBERSUSA, JUDICIAL WATCH to learn more about corruption and sleaze in the Washington’s inner sanctum. These lawmakers will not even–Enforce federal law–in SANCTUARY CITIES like San Francisco and Los Angeles where the number of illegal alien families, sponge from the government financial reservoir.

    Cities in Nevada are also overwhelmed by the illegal foreign nationals. Both states have a massive budget meltdown, caused by pandering to the illegal immigrants. These people we voted into office don’t seem to care about the American worker or legal population, when they didn’t insert any language in the Stimulus packages, Unemployment extensions or the public option in health care omitting illegal immigrants. Still we can place Reid and others who have committed themselves to pandering to corporate welfare in a garbage pile, by not voting for them again? Check out Sen. Reids’ and all the other assassins of the US Rule of Law” and their immigration enforcement grading at NUMBERSUSA.
    BOMBARD YOUR SENATORS & CONGRESSMAN/WOMEN AT THE NUMBER BELOW
    Jam the Washington switchboard next week at 202-224-3121, demand no public option health care, NO AMNESTY AND NO CENSUS COUNT OF illegal immigrants.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: