The Solid Foundation Of Change

Obama never said that the foundation of his presidency would be a tax cut for 95% of Americans.

Tax cuts for 95% of Americans was the foundation of his CAMPAIGN to be president.

Big difference. Obama makes a blur between change, and lies.

The “waters have not been muddied”; but they have been defiled a good deal more profoundly. It was not Republicans or the McCain campaign defiling America with false promises; that was and is the intent and defining characteristic of Obama.

The obvious and arrogant lie about “not one dime more” is quickly forgotten by Obama; it is just another small drop amidst an ocean of lies. When the convenience and utility of any Obama facade or artfully constructed position diminishes, it is revoked more easily and quickly than a soiled tie, but without as much reflection.

What “position” of Obama is solid enough upon which to build your future, your retirement, the education of your children; the finances of your business? Watch what Obama does; his words are suitable only for comic relief, and their severe inconstancy broadly discourage economic activity, investment and production of goods and services.

Perhaps perceptive journalists would categorize these events, position reversals by Obama as “change;” however the foundation of the Obama administration is not change, it is lies.

How many lies from Obama can you find in this historical record of Obama’s true proclivity – arrogantly deceptive packaging?

H/T: The Obama Files

Advertisements

The One: ACORN, Obama

The Truth:

You don't need income to get a mortgage

You don't need income to get a mortgage

    The Lies (by omission)

    ‘New York Times’ Spiked Obama Donor Story

    Congressional Testimony: ‘Game-Changer’ Article Would Have Connected Campaign With ACORN
    By Michael P. Tremoglie, The Bulletin
    Monday, March 30, 2009
    A lawyer involved with legal action against Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) told a House Judiciary subcommittee on March 19 The New York Times had killed a story in October that would have shown a close link between ACORN, Project Vote and the Obama campaign because it would have been a “a game changer.”

    Heather Heidelbaugh, who represented the Pennsylvania Republican State Committee in the lawsuit against the group, recounted for the ommittee what she had been told by a former ACORN worker who had worked in the group’s Washington, D.C. office. The former worker, Anita Moncrief, told Ms. Heidelbaugh last October, during the state committee’s litigation against ACORN, she had been a “confidential informant for several months to The New York Times reporter, Stephanie Strom.”

    Ms. Moncrief had been providing Ms. Strom with information about ACORN’s election activities. Ms. Strom had written several stories based on information Ms. Moncrief had given her.

    During her testimony, Ms. Heidelbaugh said Ms. Moncrief had told her The New York Times articles stopped when she revealed that the Obama presidential campaign had sent its maxed-out donor list to ACORN’s Washington, D.C. office.

    Ms. Moncrief told Ms. Heidelbaugh the campaign had asked her and her boss to “reach out to the maxed-out donors and solicit donations from them for Get Out the Vote efforts to be run by ACORN.”

    Story here: Breaking: NY Times Spiked Major Obama-ACORN Story Before Election

Superior Man

A truly superior man is among us.

Mao, Lenin, Hitler, and Stalin, would’ve put their hands over their hearts. Any idiot would have.

Be sure to give your allegiance to Obama, America. He is devoted to you.

H/T: Investigating Obama

Obama Fires GM CEO

Obama, with extensive community organizing (and ACORN instructor) business acumen and mettle filling his sails, has judged it time to send the greedy capitalist GM CEO Rick Wagoner packing; news of just this afternoon.

Rumor has it that Obama likes Franklin Raines, an industrial-strength manager without greed or capitalism, and significant demonstrated management skills from FNMA, to fill the key government/business slot. Raines was greedless enough to rig the books at FNMA to enhance management bonuses, which also qualified him as Obama’s campaign economic adviser. The only better CEO article would be a tax cheat; but those have all been snatched up. Jim Johnson, with sparkling credentials from FMAC loan manipulation, and manufacturing credit default swaps, is also in the running. Johnson starred as Obama campaign lead in the selection of idiot embarrassment non-greedy non-capitalist Joe Biden.

Obama is also jotting down sketches for the design of the new Suburban model for next year. Hint: the trailier hitch is on the front of this one.

Thank goodness for such a versatile president; a trueTeleprompter For All Seasons. The only thing we might ever need greedy capitalists for is to tax them.

Story here: Change! Obama Fires GM CEO Rick Wagoner

Hijackers Of Virtue, At Work Today

The inevitable result of “spreading the wealth around” (by governmental force, or by force of ACORN) is anarchy – economic and civil. Money is a useful tool enabling civilized, equitable exchange within a free enterprise system. Outside such a system, money is a waste of paper. The real value and importance of society is human productivity and invention, which cannot be transferred, or allocated by force. No government can replace free enterprise, although many have tried. Obama’s “change” is only another costly failure by the ignorant of history.

H/T: Ace of Spades Quote of the Weekend (Vinnie)

Capitalism Magazine Francisco’s Money Speech

(Ayn Rand, 1957: “Atlas Shrugged”)

“. . . Then you will see the rise of the men of the double standard–the men who live by force, yet count on those who live by trade to create the value of their looted money–the men who are the hitchhikers of virtue. In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law–men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims–then money becomes its creators’ avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they’ve passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter.

“Do you wish to know whether that day is coming? Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society’s virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion–when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing–when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors–when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you–when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice–you may know that your society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that is does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot.

“Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men’s protection and the base of a moral existence. Destroyers seize gold and leave to its owners a counterfeit pile of paper. This kills all objective standards and delivers men into the arbitrary power of an arbitrary setter of values. Gold was an objective value, an equivalent of wealth produced. Paper is a mortgage on wealth that does not exist, backed by a gun aimed at those who are expected to produce it. Paper is a check drawn by legal looters upon an account which is not theirs: upon the virtue of the victims. Watch for the day when it bounces, marked, ‘Account overdrawn.’

“When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, ‘Who is destroying the world? You are.

“You stand in the midst of the greatest achievements of the greatest productive civilization and you wonder why it’s crumbling around you, while you’re damning its life-blood–money. You look upon money as the savages did before you, and you wonder why the jungle is creeping back to the edge of your cities. Throughout men’s history, money was always seized by looters of one brand or another, whose names changed, but whose method remained the same: to seize wealth by force and to keep the producers bound, demeaned, defamed, deprived of honor. That phrase about the evil of money, which you mouth with such righteous recklessness, comes from a time when wealth was produced by the labor of slaves–slaves who repeated the motions once discovered by somebody’s mind and left unimproved for centuries. So long as production was ruled by force, and wealth was obtained by conquest, there was little to conquer, Yet through all the centuries of stagnation and starvation, men exalted the looters, as aristocrats of the sword, as aristocrats of birth, as aristocrats of the bureau, and despised the producers, as slaves, as traders, as shopkeepers–as industrialists.

Article continues here.

 Ayn Rand Institute.

Obama Youth Corps Demonstration Of Abilities

Because of Obama, I am . . .

What of self-reliance, Obama?

Obama has turned these young men into his dependents.

Obama thinks they will turn you into his dependents, next.

ACORN is the model; and it works just fine; if you are Obama. An absolute perversion of the human condition, of human effort, of human individuality -FUNDED BY AMERICAN TAXPAYERS.

Doubtless, greedy capitalists are to blame.

Hyperbole, or Law?

Here is the text of Obama Youth’s charter legislation, courtesy of The American Pundit That Creepy National Service Bill Is Back

To improve volunteerism, we will employ mandatory service. No hyperbole suffices for this idiocy. It is itself the worst of hyperbole; it is a pure lie. Read and sign, and The Obama Youth will be visiting you soon “requesting” your allegiance. Like ACORN requests bad mortgages. There is a pattern. It is directly from Alinsky, and before him Lenin. Thanks to your Obama, Constitutional anti-Lawyer par excellence. The unconstitutional lawyer becomes the unconstitutional POTUS.

To establish the Congressional Commission on Civic Service to study methods of improving and promoting volunteerism and national service, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Congressional Commission on Civic Service Act’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:

(1) The social fabric of the United States is stronger if individuals in the United States are committed to protecting and serving our Nation by utilizing national service and volunteerism to overcome our
civic challenges.

(2) A more engaged civic society will strengthen the Nation by bringing together people from diverse backgrounds and experiences to work on solutions to some of our Nation’s major challenges.

(3) Despite declines in civic health in the past 30 years, national service and volunteerism among the Nation’s youth are increasing, and existing national service and volunteer programs greatly enhance opportunities for youth to engage in civic activity.

(4) In addition to the benefits received by nonprofit organizations and society as a whole, volunteering and national service provide a variety of personal benefits and satisfaction and can lead to new paths of civic engagement, responsibility, and upward mobility.

SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT.

There is established in the legislative branch a commission to be known as the ‘Congressional Commission on Civic Service’ (in this Act referred to as the ‘Commission’).

SEC. 4. DUTIES.

(a) General Purpose- The purpose of the Commission is to gather and analyze information in order to make recommendations to Congress to–

(1) improve the ability of individuals in the United States to serve others and, by doing so, to enhance our Nation and the global community;

(2) train leaders in public service organizations to better utilize individuals committed to national service and volunteerism as they manage human and fiscal resources;

(3) identify and offer solutions to the barriers that make it difficult for some individuals in the United States to volunteer or perform national service; and

(4) build on the foundation of service and volunteer opportunities that are currently available.
(b) Specific Topics- In carrying out its general purpose under subsection (a), the Commission shall address and analyze the following specific topics:
(1) The level of understanding about the current Federal, State, and local volunteer programs and opportunities for service among individuals in the United States.
(2) The issues that deter volunteerism and national service, particularly among young people, and how the identified issues can be overcome.
(3) Whether there is an appropriate role for Federal, State, and local governments in overcoming the issues that deter volunteerism and national service and, if appropriate, how to expand the relationships and partnerships between different levels of government in promoting volunteerism and national service.
(4) Whether existing databases are effective in matching community needs to would-be volunteers and service providers.

(5) The effect on the Nation, on those who serve, and on the families of those who serve, if all individuals in the United States were expected to perform national service or were required to perform a certain amount of national service.

(6) Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.

(7) The need for a public service academy, a 4-year institution that offers a federally funded undergraduate education with a focus on training future public sector leaders.

(8) The means to develop awareness of national service and volunteer opportunities at a young age by creating, expanding, and promoting service options for primary and secondary school students and by raising awareness of existing incentives.

(9) The effectiveness of establishing a training program on college campuses to recruit and educate college students for national service.

(10) The effect on United States diplomacy and foreign policy interests of expanding service opportunities abroad, such as the Peace Corps, and the degree of need and capacity abroad for an expansion.

(11) The constraints that service providers, nonprofit organizations, and State and local agencies face in utilizing federally funded volunteer programs, and how these constraints can be overcome.

(12) Whether current Federal volunteer programs are suited to address the special skills and needs of senior volunteers, and if not, how these programs can be improved such that the Federal government can effectively promote service among the ‘baby boomer’ generation.