Obama Begins Media Sanctions

The same media that annointed The Obamessiah, and made him victorious in the race for the Democrat presidential nomination, now must be muzzled. All media is not yet as neurologically bonded with The Obamessiah as it must rapidly become. There remains stubborn pockets of hold-out reactionaries, such as the Hillary Clinton supporters, and racist anti-Black residue that ultimately would provide a withering friction against Obamessiah-inspired “change.” It has long been in the plans to progressively take control of media, and prison sentences for a few non-conformists is obviously high on the list of inducements. The Obama campaign is very serious about the change it intends; freedom of speech will need to be suspended for a few decades of Obamessiah enlightened stewardship, so the change America so desperately needs can be expeditious.

From Politico, Ben Smith’s Blog, via The Obama File – Latest Obamanations:

Obama Camp: Prosecute Simmons

Obama general counsel Bob Bauer today sent a second, sharper letter to the Justice Department, directly attacking the Dallas billionaire funding an anti-Obama ad, Harold Simmons.

“We reiterate our request that the Department of Justice fulfill its commitment to take prompt action to investigate and to prosecute the American issues Project, and we further request that the Department of Justice investigate and prosecute Howard (sic) Simmons for a knowing and willful violation of the individual aggregate contribution limits,” he wrote.

He called the group’s activities “patently illegal.”

Bauer made the case that Simmons’ group fulfilling its a real nonprofit charter because it hasn’t spent any money on anything other than attacking Obama.

The American Issues Project released a statement responding to the letter.

“Having failed in its attempts to get our legal, factual and fully-supported ad off the air, Barack Obama’s campaign now wants to put our donors in prison for exercising their right to free speech,” said Ed Martin, the group’s president. “These over-the-top bullying tactics are reminiscent of the kind of censorship one would see in a Stalinist dictatorship, with the only difference being that those guys generally had to wait until they were in power to throw people who disagreed with them into jail.”

There must be something suspicious about Barack Obama’s relationship with unrepentant terrorist William Ayers that he doesn’t want us to know about. He has sent out a team to threaten and silence an ad on this subject that was developed by a legitimate and independent political organization.

Now ask yourself this question, “just what is so damning about Obama’s relationship with William Ayers that he would threaten the free speech of others to prevent it from airing?

Here’s the real question, though: if Obama is elected President, will he appoint an Attorney General who will carry out politically-motivated prosecutions like the one he is now demanding? I suppose we can’t know for sure, but why wouldn’t he? If he demands criminal prosecution of free speech that opposes his political interests when he’s a candidate, why wouldn’t he order it as President?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: