Chairman Obama Clears Team, Self

Chairman Obama recently ordained that his team, and he, is clear of any complicity in Chicago’s Blagojevich abomination, according to the Los Angeles Times, here.

American Journalists, with a very few notable exceptions (Parsons & McCormick), breathed a collective sigh of relief.

Unfortunately for Obama, Obama is operating from his home ground of Chicago! (The Journalists said it; no kidding).

H/T: Obama’s First Miracle Riehl World View

The Seduction Of Economic Failure II

In case my intent was not clear

Paul Robeson, a REAL MAN compared to wimpy, skinny leg, Obama,

succumbed to the seduction of Marxism which failed shortly thererafter.

70 years later, we have Obama, succumbing to the seduction of Marxism, which failed 30 years ago.

I just wanted to clarify that.

Thank you.

Bend Over, America

Change is coming home to roost. Obama Unveils His Economic Plan.

Change means you are getting new roads. Do you need them? Would you rather build a shiney new road, or have your old job back?

Change means you are getting new bridges. Exactly which bridges need replacement?

Change means you are getting new schools. I hope you need a new school; but I doubt if you need your children indoctrinated in queer rights, not to mention queer methods. That is what you’re going to get. But I digress.

The superb infrastructure in Red Communist China may someday again be rivaled by the infrastructure of the United States. But one must ask, what is so good about the infrastructure in Red Communist China? The air, for one thing, is not breathable. The ports, the airports, the taxi stands, the highways, the bridges, are in fact not “vastly superior” to the same of America, the United States. The schools routinely collapse due to shoddy building practices. Across the board, the civil infrastructure of Red Communist China is lightyears and decades inferior to that of the United States. Why the lies, Obama? (see Obama to Busniess, Investors: China Vastly Superior).

What compels Obama to replicate the backward, inefficient, and highly toxic economic activities of Red Communist China? Was he raised by Communists? Anybody who reads a blog knows he was.

One has to seriously question the intellectual capacity of this sophomoric Marxist who thinks that building roads, bridges, and schools is going to rescue the economy; which economy was virtually destroyed by Obama’s own subprime, nothing down, no income check affordable mortgages for everybody. Obama won’t acknowledge it, but suing banks to write loans that would never be repaid is the direct precedent for the recent economic collapse. The collapse of the mortgage industry was due to writing bad loans. Obama sued Citicorp in 1994 to write more bad loans. Citicorp consented. Citicorp is now defunct.

The “economic” plan of Obama is absolutely not economic. If America wanted better roads we can build them without an Obama economic plan. We build what we need.

Yes; a bridge collapsed. One bridge.

If we need schools, we have a means to build them which means and method works better than it does in Red Communist China, Obama’s infrastructure model, by lightyears.

Obama’s plan is not an economic plan. It is a sophomoric sham. It was tried before, and it failed before. Repeating the WPA is not change; nor is it progress.

Obama Unveils His “Economic” Plan

WASHINGTON – President-elect Barack Obama promoted an economic plan Saturday he said would create 2.5 million jobs by rebuilding roads and bridges and modernizing schools while developing alternative energy sources and more efficient cars.

“These aren’t just steps to pull ourselves out of this immediate crisis. These are the long-term investments in our economic future that have been ignored for far too long,” Obama said in the weekly Democratic radio address.

The goal is to it quickly through Congress, with help from both parties, after Obama takes office Jan. 20. The plan, which envisions those new jobs by January 2011, is “big enough to meet the challenges we face,” he said.

Obama noted the growing evidence the country is “facing an economic crisis of historic proportions” and said he was pleased Congress passed an extension of unemployment benefits this past week. But, he added, `We must do more to put people back to work and get our economy moving again.”

Nonetheless, he said, “There are no quick or easy fixes to this crisis, which has been many years in the making, and it’s likely to get worse before it gets better.”

What Obama’s “change: really means: Try only the old collectivist solutions; the ones that have failed so disasterously, before. Ignore the human tragedy of 10 years of Roosevelt, WPA depression.

Obama Destroys Citicorp

Obama VICTORY over evil, capitalist, free enterprise Citicorp:


Why did Obama sue CitiBank to make them give loans to unqualified mortgage applicants resulting in the meltdown?
Case Name
Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance
Docket / Court 94 C 4094 ( N.D. Ill. ) FH-IL-0011
State/Territory Illinois
Case Summary
Plaintiffs filed their class action lawsuit on July 6, 1994, alleging that Citibank had engaged in redlining practices in the Chicago metropolitan area in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), 15 U.S.C. 1691; the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601-3619; the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; and 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1982. Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendant-bank rejected loan applications of minority applicants while approving loan applications filed by white applicants with similar financial characteristics and credit histories. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief, actual damages, and punitive damages.

U.S. District Court Judge Ruben Castillo certified the Plaintiffs’ suit as a class action on June 30, 1995. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 162 F.R.D. 322 (N.D. Ill. 1995). Also on June 30, Judge Castillo granted Plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery of a sample of Defendant-bank’s loan application files. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 162 F.R.D. 338 (N.D. Ill. 1995).

The parties voluntarily dismissed the case on May 12, 1998, pursuant to a settlement agreement.
Plaintiff’s Lawyers
Obama, Barack H. (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Alexis, Hilary I. (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Childers, Michael Allen (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Clayton, Fay (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Cummings, Jeffrey Irvine (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-7501 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Love, Sara Norris (Virginia)
Miner, Judson Hirsch (Illinois)
FH-IL-0011-7500 | FH-IL-0011-9000
Wickert, John Henry (Illinois)

Former Citicorp employees can now repair blacktop. Thanks, Obama change.

Ruler Obama: Public Schools, Great For Your Children

Ruler Obama is a strong supporter of GREAT public schools for your children.

So that more of your children can attend GREAT public schools, Messianic Saviour & Ruler Obama has decreed that his own children will attend an inferior private school.

Oh; Sidwell School offers security and privacy. Quality of education is the exclusive domain of public schools, notwithstanding. Thus sayeth Obama.

Obamas chose private Sidwell Friends School

President-elect Barack Obama and his wife have chosen Sidwell Friends School for their two daughters, opting for a private institution that another White House child, Chelsea Clinton, attended a decade ago.

“A number of great schools were considered. In the end, the Obamas selected the school that was the best fit for what their daughters need right now,” said Katie McCormick Lelyveld, a spokeswoman for Michelle Obama.

She said Malia, 10, and Sasha, 7, “bring with them a number of security and privacy concerns that come with being part of the new first family – and the school they’ve selected is positioned to appropriately accommodate that.”

Obama Wealth Spreading Tip: Iranian Caviar

The rhetoric:  “The truth is, in order to get things like Universal Health Care and a revamped Education System, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of the pie so that someone else can have more.” — Michelle Obama

The reality:  From the Waldorf-Astoria, Michelle’s late afternoon snack:

Michelle Spreads Your Wealth

Michelle Spreads Your Wealth

Michelle Obama’s $500 snack of lobster, caviar and champagne makes one wonder what dinner looked like?  She’s into low carbs, though.  That’s a high protein, top-shelf lunch.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will be delighted to see Michelle prefers “Iranian” caviar.

More Here

Spreading Happiness

Spreading happiness, spreading change, spreading hope, and spreading nothing down, ez qualification and adjustable interest mortgages – to your children.

Did CEOs ruin North Korea? Did CEOs ruin Cuba? Did CEOs ruin Vietnam? Did CEOs rape Cambodia?

Who is ruining your children? Is it the CEOs?


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.